“How Can a Woman Who Has Been Raped Be Be-lieved?” : Andrea Dworkin, Sexual Violence and the Ethics of Belief
In June 2000, Andrea Dworkin, an American feminist activist and author, pub-lished an account of being raped in a Paris hotel room a year earlier. The story was met with widespread disbelief, including from feminist readers. This article explores the reasons for this disbelief, asking how and why narratives of rape are granted – or denied – truth status by their readers. The article argues for understanding the conferral of belief as a narrative transaction involving the actions of both narrator and reader. It posits that Dworkin was widely seen as an unreliable narrator but argues that for ideologically charged narratives such as rape narratives judgements of reliability and belief inevitably draw upon the normative standpoint of the reader. I suggest that there are opposing criteria for establishing the truth of rape narratives; a ‘factual’ or legal model, which sees rape narratives as requiring scrutiny, and an ‘experiential’ model, located within certain strands of feminist politics, which emphasises the ethical importance of believing women’s narratives. The article finishes with a consideration of the place of belief within an ethics of reading and reception of rape narratives.
Use and reproduction:This work may be used under a
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)